![]() Size change of upgraded packages: 610.99 MiB Perhaps "has not authenticated to FAS in 2+ years" could be considered a form of abandonment? This subject seems worthy of discussion at the next FESCO meeting.įAS username: aperezbios FAS password for aperezbios: Last login in FAS: erikos Last action on koji: Sun, tag_package_owners entry revoked by oscar Last package update on bodhi: No activity found on bodhi The only two e-mail addresses I could find for Simon were both aliases, simon(a) and simon(a) Both are no longer functional, nor have they been for a couple of years.Īs an aside, I'd like to propose that FESCO consider revising the requirements to simplify/expedite assumption of packages which have clearly been abandoned by their previous maintainers. I can't find a working e-mail address for him, and and I are trying to get the remaining core Sugar packages updated to the current version, before the F34 freeze happens. ![]() I've opened to facilitate assumption ownership of the Sugar packages in Fedora, most of which are de-facto abandoned by the previous maintainer, erikos, who has not authenticated with his FAS account since March of 2017, nearly three years ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |